Chimps have a distinct sense of right and wrong and dislike unfair occurrences, such as being denied food they were working towards acquiring. Evolutionary biologist Keith Jensen of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, wanted to know whether chimps can be spiteful. Jensen and his colleagues placed two chimps into separate cages facing one another, with a table in between them that held peanuts. One of the two chimps, which could not access the table, nonetheless had the power to deprive its compatriot of food, by pulling a rope in its cage and collapsing the table. But the chimp did that no more often than in another experiment where it was alone. Frustration at being unable to reach the food itself, not a petty desire to deny food to the other chimp, was behind its behavior, the team concludes this week online in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. But would the chimp be this accommodating if food it was eating were stolen from it, and would it care whether a chimp or a human was the thief? To find out, the researchers offered the animals peanuts on a sliding tray on top of the table standing between them. As in the first experiment, one chimp could pull a rope to upset the food tray. Here, however, both chimps could access the food--but only one at a time could do so. While the chimp with the rope was chomping away, either the second chimp would slide the tray of food from it, or a researcher would take the food away and offer it to the chimp without the rope. The disgruntled chimp pulled the rope almost 50% of the time when the other chimp stole its food, showing a tendency to punish the offending chimp for theft by cutting off its access to the food. But when it was a human who took the food away to give to the other chimp, the chimp only pulled the rope about 20% of the time. "It's like a kid with a big slice of cake, and then having an adult take it to give to another kid," says Jensen--something that may not prompt the same outrage as one child stealing cake from another. The chimp's behavior, he says, shows that it punishes the chimp only when it's the offender.Explicatia acestei diferente dintre oameni si cimpanzei cred ca e urmatoarea: Diferenta de baza e ca, spre deosebire de cimpanzei, oamenii sunt capabili de a coopera in vederea unui scop comun, iar acest lucru a capatat o mare importanta pentru noi. De aceea pentru un om o situatie precum cea din experiment e perceputa negativ pentru ca face imposibila cooperarea. Pe de alta parte cimpanzeii nu simt resentiment pentru ca pentru ei situatia din experiment e normala, si in mediul lor natural unii sunt mai norocosi iar altii mai putin norocosi si nu are rost sa ataci pe cineva decat daca ai posibilitatea sa beneficiezi de pe urma atacului. Datorita capacitatii lor mult mai mari de a coopera, oamenii beneficieaza de pe urma manifestarii resentimentului pentru ca ii "educa" astfel pe ceilalti sa fie mai cooperativi decat ar fi altfel.
28 July 2007
Cimpanzeii nu stiu cum sa-i faca cuiva in ciuda
Resentimentul este un sentiment destul de raspandit printre oameni. Daca ei nu pot avea ceva (sa zicem multi bani), si vad pe altcineva ca are acel lucru (chiar daca l-a dobandit pe cai oneste), ei sunt dispusi sa-i faca probleme acelei persoane doar asa "de-ai dracu", chiar daca n-au nimic de castigat din asta. Resentimentul si a-i face in ciuda cuiva sunt in general considerate comportamente necivilizate, asa ca cercetatorii de la Max Plank Institute din Leipzig si-au propus sa vada daca ele sunt specific umane. Raspunsul e ca sunt.